4.6 Article

Regorafenib plus toripalimab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase Ib/II clinical trial and gut microbiome analysis

Journal

CELL REPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 2, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100383

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81930065, 81872011, 81903163, 81802438, 31801037]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangdong [2019B020227002]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201904020046, 201803040019, 201704020228]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M663306]
  5. Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program [2018014]
  6. Shanghai Junshi Biosciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates the efficacy of regorafenib plus toripalimab in treating colorectal cancer, as well as the response rates in specific patient populations and the occurrence of treatment-related adverse events. Patients with liver metastases show lower response rates, and those with higher abundance of Fusobacterium have shorter progression-free survival.
This is a phase Ib/II study of regorafenib plus toripalimab for colorectal cancer. The objective response rate (ORR) is 15.2% and the disease control rate is 36.4% in evaluable patients with recommended phase II dose (80 mg regorafenib plus toripalimab). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and the median overall survival are 2.1 months and 15.5 months, respectively. Patients with liver metastases have lower ORR than those without (8.7% versus 30.0%). All patients (3/3) with lung-only metastasis respond, whereas no patients (0/4) with liver-only metastasis respond. 94.9% and 38.5% of patients have grade 1 and grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, respectively. Gut microbiome analysis of the baseline fecal samples shows significantly increased relative abundance and positive detection rate of Fusobacterium in non-responders than responders. Patients with high-abundance Fusobacterium have shorter PFS than those with low abundance (median PFS = 2.0 versus 5.2 months; p = 0.002).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available