3.8 Article

Determination of Sulfacetamide Sodium in Pure and Their Pharmaceutical Formulations by Using Cloud Point Extraction Method

Journal

BAGHDAD SCIENCE JOURNAL
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 575-582

Publisher

COLL SCIENCE WOMEN, UNIV BAGHDAD
DOI: 10.21123/bsj.2021.18.3.0575

Keywords

Cloud point extraction; Determination; Ecological - friendly; Spectrophotometry; Sulfacetamide sodium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed simple, low cost, precise and fast spectrophotometric methods for evaluating sulfacetamide sodium. Two different approaches were utilized, resulting in successful quantification of sulfacetamide sodium in both pure and pharmaceutical formulations.
In this study, simple, low cost, precise and speed spectrophotometric methods development for evaluation of sulfacetamide sodium are described. The primary approach contains conversion of sulfacetamide sodium to diazonium salt followed by a reaction with p-cresol as a reagent in the alkaline media. The colored product has an orange colour with absorbance at lambda max 450 nm. At the concentration range of (5.0-100 mu g.mL(-1)), the Beef s Low is obeyed with correlation coefficient (R-2= 0.9996), limit of detection as 0.2142 mu g.mL(-1), limit of quantification as 0.707 mu g.mL(-1) and molar absorptivity as 1488.249 L.mol(-1).cm(-1). The other approach, cloud point extraction was utilized to an estimation of a trace amount of the colored product in the previous procedure followed by a measuring process with a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. The linearity of the calibration graph was above the range of (1.0-60 mu g.mL(-1)), the correlation coefficient (R-2= 0.9991) and molar absorptivity was 7417.622 L.mol(-1).cm(-1). The detection limit(LOD) and quantification limit(LOQ) were based to be 0.070 and 0.231 mu g.mL(-1), respectively. This approach was successfully employed for sulfacetamide sodium detection within the pure and pharmaceutical formulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available