4.6 Article

Exploring the U-Net plus plus Model for Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 125523-125539

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3111131

Keywords

Image segmentation; Tumors; Adaptation models; Brain modeling; Standards; Predictive models; Decoding; Brain tumor; BraTS; deep learning; image segmentation; U-Net; U-Net plus plus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The article introduces a novel adaptation of the U-Net++ model and demonstrates its excellent performance in brain tumor segmentation. The proposed approach differs from the standard U-Net++ model in terms of loss function, number of convolutional blocks, and deep supervision method. By implementing data augmentation and post-processing techniques, the model predictions were substantially improved.
The accessibility and potential of deep learning techniques have increased considerably over the past years. Image segmentation is one of the many fields which have seen novel implementations being developed to solve problems in the domain. U-Net is an example of a popular deep learning model designed specifically for biomedical image segmentation, initially proposed for cell segmentation. We propose a variation of the U-Net++ model, which is itself an adaptation of U-Net, and evaluate its brain tumor segmentation capabilities. The proposed approach obtained Dice Coefficient scores of 0.7192, 0.8712, and 0.7817 for the Enhancing Tumor, Whole Tumor and Tumor Core classes of the BraTS 2019 challenge Validation Dataset. The proposed approach differs from the standard U-Net++ model in a number of ways, including the loss function, number of convolutional blocks, and method of employing deep supervision. Data augmentation and post-processing techniques were also implemented and observed to substantially improve the model predictions. Thus, this article presents a novel adaptation of the U-Net++ architecture, which is both lightweight, and performs comparably with peer-reviewed work evaluated on the same data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available