About the Transferability of Topographic Correction Methods From Spaceborne to Airborne Optical Data

In rugged terrain, topography substantially influences the illumination and observation geometry, and thus, the bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) of a surface. While this problem has been known and investigated for spaceborne optical data since the 1980s, it has led to several well-known topographic correction methods. To date, the methods developed for spaceborne data were equivalently applied to airborne data with distinctly higher spatial resolution, illumination/observation angle configurations and finally (instantaneous) field of view (FOV). On the one hand, this article evaluates, whether such a transfer of methods from spaceborne to airborne acquisitions is reasonable. On the other hand, a new Lambertian/statistical-empirical correction method is introduced. While in the spaceborne case the Modified Minnaert (MM) and the Statistical-Empirical (SE) methods performed best, MM led to the statistically and visually best compromise for the airborne data. Our results suggest further that with a higher spatial resolution various effects come into play (FOV widening; changing the fraction of geometric, volumetric and isotropic scattering, etc.), compromising previously successful methods, such as the SE method.

Automated summary

This article evaluates the transfer of methods from spaceborne to airborne acquisitions and introduces a new Lambertian/statistical-empirical correction method. The new method showed good performance in airborne data and suggests that effects of higher spatial resolution may compromise previously successful methods.