4.4 Review

Pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical evidence of relationship between Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and cardiovascular disease

Journal

REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages 755-768

Publisher

IMR PRESS
DOI: 10.31083/j.rcm2203082

Keywords

NAFLD; Cardiovascular disease; Pathophysiology; Type 2 diabetes; Cardiovascular risk

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is a strong association between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and increased cardiovascular (CV) risk, possibly due to mechanisms such as insulin resistance, inflammation, oxidative stress, and triglyceride accumulation. Studies have shown that NAFLD is related to preclinical atherosclerotic damage and various cardiovascular events. Treatment of NAFLD may have an impact on cardiovascular outcomes.
Evidence suggests a close connection between Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. Several cross-sectional studies report that NAFLD is related to preclinical atherosclerotic damage, and to coronary, cerebral and peripheral vascular events. Similar results have been showed by prospective studies and also by meta-analyzes on observational studies. The pathophysiological mechanisms of NAFLD are related to insulin resistance, which causes a dysfunction in adipokine production, especially adiponectin, from adipose tissue. A proinflammatory state and an increase in oxidative stress, due to increased reacting oxygen species (ROS) formation with consequent oxidation of free fatty acids and increased de novo lipogenesis with accumulation of triglycerides, are observed. These mechanisms may have an impact on atherosclerotic plaque formation and progression, and they can lead to increased cardiovascular risk in subjects with NAFLD. This review extensively discusses and comments current and developing NAFLD therapies and their possible impact on cardiovascular outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available