Journal
IMA JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT MATHEMATICS
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 411-424Publisher
OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/imaman/dpaa023
Keywords
sports; fairness; shootout; prouhet-thue-morse sequence
Categories
Funding
- NWO Gravitation Project NETWORKS [024.002.003]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The order of shooting in a shootout affects scoring probability, leading to fairness concerns. It has been found that in certain situations, a fair shooting sequence does not exist. Additionally, an algorithm has been developed to generate a fair sequence.
A shootout is a popular mechanism to identify a winner of a match between two teams. It consists of rounds in which each team gets, sequentially, an opportunity to score a point. It has been shown empirically that shooting first or shooting second in a round has an impact on the scoring probability. This raises a fairness question: is it possible to specify a sequence such that identical teams have equal chance of winning? We show that, for a sudden death, no repetitive sequence can be fair. In addition, we show that the so-called Prohuet-Thue-Morse sequence is not fair. There is, however, an algorithm that outputs a fair sequence whenever one exists. We also analyze the popular best-of-k shootouts and show that no fair sequence exists in this situation. In addition, we find explicit expressions for the degree of unfairness in a best-of-k shootout; this allows sports administrators to asses the effect of the length of the shootout on the degree of unfairness.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available