4.6 Article

Learn from the past and prepare for the future: A critical assessment of crisis management research in hospitality

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102915

Keywords

Crisis; Crisis management; Hospitality; Literature review; Covid-19

Funding

  1. Institute of International Business and Governance
  2. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [UGC/IDS16/17]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides a synthesis and critical assessment of crisis management research in the hospitality industry, categorizing articles based on a three-stage framework and identifying two main perspectives. It also proposes four major directions for future research and discusses the theoretical and practical implications of the study.
Given the substantial impact of crisis on the hospitality industry, crisis and crisis management have drawn attention from scholars. While each study makes a significant contribution to the existing knowledge of crisis management in hospitality, the fragmented perspective of each study makes it difficult to identify the key findings and unsolved problems. This paper presents a synthesis and critical assessment of state-of-the-art crisis management research in hospitality. It categorizes articles based on a three-stage framework covering pre-crisis planning, mid-crisis management, and post-crisis recovery. Two main perspectives in the literature are identified: one from hospitality service providers and one from stakeholders. Core research topics and concepts in each stage and perspective are reviewed. In addition, this paper proposes four major directions for future research: crisis management from stakeholders' perspectives, integrative research, causal and behavioral research, and theoretical enhancement. It discusses the theoretical and practical implications of this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available