3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Nullspace Property for Subspace-Preserving Recovery

Journal

Publisher

JMLR-JOURNAL MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a necessary and sufficient condition for subspace-preserving recovery, inspired by classical nullspace property. Through equivalent characterizations, the relationship between data distribution and recovery success is explained, and new sufficient conditions based on inner-radius and outer-radius measures are derived to provide a more comprehensive understanding in the field of subspace-preserving recovery. These results address an important gap in the existing literature.
Much of the theory for classical sparse recovery is based on conditions on the dictionary that are both necessary and sufficient (e.g., nullspace property) or only sufficient (e.g., incoherence and restricted isometry). In contrast, much of the theory for subspace-preserving recovery, the theoretical underpinnings for sparse subspace classification and clustering methods, is based on conditions on the subspaces and the data that are only sufficient (e.g., subspace incoherence and data inner-radius). This paper derives a necessary and sufficient condition for subspace-preserving recovery that is inspired by the classical nullspace property. Based on this novel condition, called here the subspace nullspace property, we derive equivalent characterizations that either admit a clear geometric interpretation that relates data distribution and subspace separation to the recovery success, or can be verified using a finite set of extreme points of a properly defined set. We further exploit these characterizations to derive new sufficient conditions, based on inner-radius and outer-radius measures and dual bounds, that generalize existing conditions and preserve the geometric interpretations. These results fill an important gap in the subspace-preserving recovery literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available