3.8 Proceedings Paper

Effectiveness of Arbitrary Transfer Sets for Data-free Knowledge Distillation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Knowledge Distillation is an effective method for transferring learning across deep neural networks. The study shows that using arbitrary data for knowledge distillation can have surprising effectiveness, especially when the dataset is balanced, which may potentially lead to the design of baselines for data-free knowledge distillation.
Knowledge Distillation is an effective method to transfer the learning across deep neural networks. Typically, the dataset originally used for training the Teacher model is chosen as the Transfer Set to conduct the knowledge transfer to the Student. However, this original training data may not always be freely available due to privacy or sensitivity concerns. In such scenarios, existing approaches either iteratively compose a synthetic set representative of the original training dataset, one sample at a time or learn a generative model to compose such a transfer set. However, both these approaches involve complex optimization (GAN training or several backpropagation steps to synthesize one sample) and are often computationally expensive. In this paper, as a simple alternative, we investigate the effectiveness of arbitrary transfer sets such as random noise, publicly available synthetic, and natural datasets, all of which are completely unrelated to the original training dataset in terms of their visual or semantic contents. Through extensive experiments on multiple benchmark datasets such as MNIST, FMNIST, CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, we discover and validate surprising effectiveness of using arbitrary data to conduct knowledge distillation when this dataset is target-class balanced. We believe that this important observation can potentially lead to designing baselines for the data-free knowledge distillation task.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available