4.6 Article

Combining Quinone-Based Cathode with an Efficient Borate Electrolyte for High-Performance Magnesium Batteries

Journal

BATTERIES & SUPERCAPS
Volume 4, Issue 12, Pages 1850-1857

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/batt.202100163

Keywords

borate; chlorine-free electrolyte; magnesium battery; organic cathode material; quinone-based cathode

Funding

  1. European Union [824066]
  2. German Research Foundation (DFG) [390874152]
  3. Projekt DEAL
  4. Karlsruhe Nano Facility (KNMF) for electron microscopy and spectroscopy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rechargeable magnesium batteries are attracting attention due to their high energy, safety, and sustainability, yet the lack of efficient cathode materials and compatible electrode-electrolyte combinations hinders their development. A new poly(1,4-anthraquinone)/Ketjenblack composite with a non-corrosive electrolyte has shown remarkable electrochemical performance in magnesium batteries, including high discharge capacity, cycling stability, and rate capability.
Rechargeable magnesium batteries are gaining attention as promising candidates for large-scale energy storage applications because of their potentially high energy, safety and sustainability. However, the development of Mg batteries is impeded by the lack of efficient cathode materials and compatible electrode-electrolyte combinations. Herein, we demonstrate a new poly(1,4-anthraquinone)/Ketjenblack composite (14PAQ@KB) in combination with non-corrosive magnesium tetrakis(hexafluoroisopropyloxy) borate Mg[B(hfip)(4)](2) (hfip=OC(H)(CF3)(2)) electrolyte towards high-energy and long-lifespan Mg batteries. This combination exhibits prominent electrochemical performance including a maximum discharge capacity of 242 mA h g(-1) (approximately 93 % of the theoretical capacity), superior cycling stability (81 mA h g(-1) after 1000 cycles), and excellent rate capability (120 mA h g(-1) at 5 C).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available