4.5 Article

Antacid exposure and immunotherapy outcomes among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17588359211010937

Keywords

antacid; hepatocellular carcinoma; immunotherapy; proton pump inhibitor

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Strategic Fund [PS3416]
  2. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center [P30CA196521-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that exposure to PPI/H2RA prior to ICIs does not adversely affect outcomes in HCC patients, including overall survival, overall response rate, and treatment-related adverse events.
Background: Antibiotic exposure has been associated with worse outcomes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients, likely due to disruption of the gut microbiome. Other commonly prescribed medications, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine-2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs), are also known to disrupt the microbiome, but data on their association with ICI outcomes are conflicting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter, international cohort study including 314 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with ICIs from 2017 to 2019 to assess the association between PPI or H2RA exposure (up to 30days before ICI) and overall survival. Secondary outcomes included overall response rate (ORR) and development of any treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results: Baseline PPI/H2RA exposure was not associated with overall survival in univariable (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.75-1.35) or multivariable analysis (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.71-1.36). Baseline PPI/H2RA exposure was not associated with either ORR (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.66-2.65) or AEs (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.54-2.12) in multivariable analysis. Conclusions: Our results suggest that exposure to PPI/H2RA prior to ICIs does not adversely affect outcomes in HCC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available