4.5 Article

Low Nitrous Oxide Emissions in a Boreal Spruce Forest Soil, Despite Long-Term Fertilization

Journal

FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/ffgc.2021.710574

Keywords

forest fertilization; nitrous oxide emissions; boreal forest soil; Norway spruce; carbon-to-nitrogen ratio

Funding

  1. Swedish Energy Agency
  2. Swedish Research Council (VR) [2010-3795]
  3. Swedish Research Council Formas [2010-3795]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen fertilization can greatly increase stem wood production in boreal forests, but it also may lead to higher emissions of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O). A study in Northern Sweden found that long-term nutrient optimization fertilization resulted in N2O emissions about twice as high in fertilized plots compared to control plots.
Nitrogen (N) fertilization can increase stem wood production by several hundred percent in boreal forests. At the same time, there are concerns about the environmental consequences of N fertilization, especially considering losses of the greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (N2O) to the atmosphere. Soils are a large contributor to N2O emissions on a global scale. The aim of this study was to investigate the consequences of long-term nutrient optimization fertilization on N2O emissions in a boreal forest in Northern Sweden. Field N2O flux measurements were conducted during 2 years with manual and automatic chambers, as well as gas probes in the snow. The N2O emissions were generally low during the whole period of measurements, both from the control and fertilized plots. The emissions were generally highest during the winters, as well as the variability in the observed values. Overall, N2O emissions from fertilized plots were about twice the control, which could be explained by changes in the soil carbon-to-nitrogen ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available