4.8 Article

Anipose: A toolkit for robust markerless 3D pose estimation

Journal

CELL REPORTS
Volume 36, Issue 13, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109730

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship
  2. University of Washington's Institute for Neuroengineering (UWIN)
  3. Center for Neurotechnology (CNT)
  4. National Institutes of Health [F31NS115477, R00 NS088193, DP2NS105555, R01NS111479, U19NS112959, R01NS102333, U19NS104655]
  5. Searle Scholars Program
  6. Pew Charitable Trusts
  7. McKnight Foundation
  8. Sloan Research Fellowship
  9. Washington Research Foundation
  10. Searle Scholar Program
  11. Pew Biomedical Scholar Program
  12. Tuthill labs
  13. Brunton lab

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anipose is an open-source toolkit for robust markerless 3D pose estimation, built on the 2D tracking method DeepLabCut. It enables users to expand existing experimental setups for accurate 3D tracking. Analysis of 3D leg kinematics tracked with Anipose reveals the key role of joint rotation in motor control of fly walking.
Quantifying movement is critical for understanding animal behavior. Advances in computer vision now enable markerless tracking from 2D video, but most animals move in 3D. Here, we introduce Anipose, an opensource toolkit for robust markerless 3D pose estimation. Anipose is built on the 2D tracking method DeepLabCut, so users can expand their existing experimental setups to obtain accurate 3D tracking. It consists of four components: (1) a 3D calibration module, (2) filters to resolve 2D tracking errors, (3) a triangulation module that integrates temporal and spatial regularization, and (4) a pipeline to structure processing of large numbers of videos. We evaluate Anipose on a calibration board as well as mice, flies, and humans. By analyzing 3D leg kinematics tracked with Anipose, we identify a key role for joint rotation in motor control of fly walking.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available