4.7 Article

Protected-area targets could be undermined by climate change-driven shifts in ecoregions and biomes

Journal

COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43247-021-00270-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. USDA Forest Service
  2. Rocky Mountain Research Station
  3. Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute
  4. NASA [80NSSC19K00181]
  5. Google

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that over half of the global land area could experience climate-driven dissociations between ecoregions or biomes, posing challenges to expanding the protected area network for biodiversity preservation.
Expanding the global protected area network is critical for addressing biodiversity declines and the climate crisis. However, how climate change will affect ecosystem representation within the protected area network remains unclear. Here we use spatial climate analogs to examine potential climate-driven shifts in terrestrial ecoregions and biomes under a +2 degrees C warming scenario and associated implications for achieving 30% area-based protection targets. We find that roughly half of land area will experience climate conditions that correspond with different ecoregions and nearly a quarter will experience climates from a different biome. Of the area projected to remain climatically stable, 46% is currently intact (low human modification). The area required to achieve protection targets in 87% of ecoregions exceeds the area that is intact, not protected, and projected to remain climatically stable within those ecoregions. Therefore, we propose that prioritization schemes will need to explicitly consider climate-driven changes in patterns of biodiversity. Preservation of biodiversity by expanding protected areas is complicated by expected climate change that could dissociate ecoregion or biome from climate conditions in over half of land area, according to analyses of spatial climate analogs

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available