4.6 Article

Microkinetic and sensitivity analysis of oxidative dry reforming of methane on Ni-Co catalyst using a reaction mechanism based on Ni

Journal

REACTION CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages 2104-2113

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1re00086a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The microkinetic modelling of dry reforming of methane (DRM) with O-2 co-feed shows that feeding O-2 improves CH4 conversion, reduces carbon deposition, and increases H-2/CO ratio. Microkinetic analysis reveals that the surface coverage of empty sites tracks CH4 conversion, while the H-2/CO ratio is directly related to surface H* and CO* coverages. Sensitivity analysis highlights that CH4 dissociation is the rate-determining step for the ODRM reaction.
Microkinetic modelling of dry reforming of methane (DRM) with O-2 co-feed was performed using a previously developed reforming mechanism. The model was validated by comparing simulated results with experimentally determined data over a variety of reaction conditions. Numerically predicted results show that co-feeding O-2 improved CH4 conversion, reduced carbon deposition, and increased H-2/CO ratio. Microkinetic analysis shows that during oxidative dry reforming of methane (ODRM), the surface coverage of empty sites tracks the CH4 conversion. Furthermore, the H-2/CO ratio is directly related to the surface H* and CO* coverages. Sensitivity analysis highlighted that CH4 dissociation is the rate-determining step for ODRM reaction, and the adsorption-desorption steps are equilibrated. We were able to obtain a reduced mechanism (35 steps) for ODRM by applying a previously suggested hierarchical chemistry reduction strategy on the full mechanism (52 steps). The apparent activation energy for CH4 consumption and orders of the reaction were also determined.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available