4.5 Article

Core or Shell? Er3+ FRET Donors in Upconversion Nanoparticles

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume -, Issue 44, Pages 5186-5195

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/ejic.201700904

Keywords

Upconversion; FRET; Fluorescence; Biosensors; DNA

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) France, (M-era.Net-project NANOHYPE)
  2. COST Action (The European upconversion network - from the design of photon-upconverting nanomaterials to biomedical applications) [CM1403]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  5. Fonds de recherche du Quebec - Nature et technologies (FRQNT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) are of high interest for biosensing because of their unique near-infrared-excitation and visible-emission features. An emerging field within UCNP biosensing is the detection of biological interactions through Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). However, the relatively large size, the distribution of emitting lanthanide ions within the nanoparticle, the unknown photoluminescence (PL) quantum yields (QY) of these emitting ions, and the many available core-shell architectures make the interpretation of UCNP-based FRET data extremely difficult. Here, we present a detailed spectroscopic study of three types of NaGdF4:Er3+,Yb3+ UCNPs with and without shells and lanthanide-ion doping in the cores or the shells. The different architectures strongly influence the brightness and PL lifetimes of the UCNPs, which are important properties for FRET to Cy3.5 dyes attached to the UCNP surfaces through DNA. Analysis of the FRET-sensitized dye PL decays allows the determination of the FRET efficiencies, which, in turn, can be used to estimate donor-acceptor distances, Forster distances, and Er3+ donor QYs, all of which are difficult to assess by other methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available