3.8 Review

A guideline for 3D printing terminology in biomedical research utilizing ISO/ASTM standards

Journal

3D PRINTING IN MEDICINE
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1186/s41205-021-00098-5

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article provides recommendations for standardized lexicons for 3D printing technologies in medical literature, suggesting the use of standard ISO/ASTM terms along with additional non-standard terms to facilitate communication and reproducibility. Aligning to these guidelines will lead to improved clarity and reproducibility of published work, ultimately increasing impact and promoting the dissemination and adoption of 3D printing in the medical community.
First patented in 1986, three-dimensional (3D) printing, also known as additive manufacturing or rapid prototyping, now encompasses a variety of distinct technology types where material is deposited, joined, or solidified layer by layer to create a physical object from a digital file. As 3D printing technologies continue to evolve, and as more manuscripts describing these technologies are published in the medical literature, it is imperative that standardized terminology for 3D printing is utilized. The purpose of this manuscript is to provide recommendations for standardized lexicons for 3D printing technologies described in the medical literature. For all 3D printing methods, standard general ISO/ASTM terms for 3D printing should be utilized. Additional, non-standard terms should be included to facilitate communication and reproducibility when the ISO/ASTM terms are insufficient in describing expository details. By aligning to these guidelines, the use of uniform terms for 3D printing and the associated technologies will lead to improved clarity and reproducibility of published work which will ultimately increase the impact of publications, facilitate quality improvement, and promote the dissemination and adoption of 3D printing in the medical community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available