4.6 Article

China's Wildlife Management Policy Framework: Preferences, Coordination and Optimization

Journal

LAND
Volume 10, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/land10090909

Keywords

wildlife protection; biodiversity conservation; policy framework; policy formulation; China

Funding

  1. National Science & Technology Major Project of China [2016ZX05040001]
  2. Soft Science Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology [2020JDR0098]
  3. Special Research Projects of Prevention and Control on COVID-19 Pandemic of Law School, Sichuan University by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020fxzy-08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed China's wildlife management policy framework and found a preference for compulsory tools, limited participation of citizens and non-governmental organizations, and a focus on conservation objectives. The study recommends a more coordinated and participatory policy framework for China's wildlife management policies.
The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic led to global concerns about the delicate relationship between humans and wildlife. However, quantitative research on the elements of a wildlife management policy framework in a certain country is lacking. In this study, we try to close this research gap by analyzing the formulation preferences of key elements in the wildlife management policy framework, as well as the coordination between them, in China, which is generally regarded as a main wildlife consumption country. Based on the content analysis of China's wildlife management policy documents, with a three-dimensional analytical framework, we find that: China's wildlife management policy framework prefers the use of compulsory tools, while voluntary and mixed tools are not fully used; adequate attention is paid to the biodiversity conservation objectives and attention is paid to the objectives of public health protection and wildlife welfare, while the utilization objective is restricted to some extent; government sectors, industry, citizens, and non-governmental organizations are involved in wildlife management policies and the degrees of participation of citizens and non-governmental organizations are relatively low. In conclusion, we draw wider implications for China's wildlife management policy formulation, arguing for a more coordinated and participatory policy framework.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available