4.2 Article

IgG4-related disease and lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome: A comparative case series

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages 378-387

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12842

Keywords

eosinophil; hypereosinophilic syndrome; hypergammaglobulinemia; IgG4; IgG4-related disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Hal Kettleson Hematology Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo compare the clinical and laboratory features of IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) and lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilic syndrome (L-HES), two rare diseases that often present with lymphadenopathy, gastrointestinal symptoms, eosinophilia, and elevated immunoglobulins/IgE. MethodComparative case series of 31 patients with IgG4-RD and 13 patients with L-HES. ResultsPeripheral blood eosinophilia was present in eight of 31 patients with IgG4-RD compared to 13 of 13 patients with L-HES (median eosinophils 0.4 vs 7.0giga/L, P=.001) and 12 of 20 patients with IgG4-RD had increased serum IgE compared to eight of 13 patients with L-HES, P=.930. Twenty-seven of 30 patients with IgG4-RD had elevated serum IgG4 compared to five of 12 patients with L-HES (median IgG4 9.6g/L vs 0.80g/L, P=.002). Flow cytometry demonstrated an aberrant T-cell phenotype in 7 of 23 patients with IgG4-RD and 13 of 13 patients with L-HES (P<.001). T-cell clonality by PCR was positive in 12 of 23 patients with IgG4-RD vs 10 of 13 patients with L-HES (P=.143). Patients in both groups received corticosteroids as first-line therapy. For refractory disease in IgG4-RD, rituximab was the most common steroid-sparing agent, whereas in L-HES, it was pegylated interferon--2a. ConclusionThe overlapping features of these two diseases with divergent treatment options demonstrate the importance of familiarity with both entities to optimize diagnosis and treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available