4.7 Article

Extending Shelf Life and Maintaining Quality of Tomato Fruit by Calcium Chloride, Hydrogen Peroxide, Chitosan, and Ozonated Water

Journal

HORTICULTURAE
Volume 7, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae7090309

Keywords

Solanum lycopersicum; antioxidants; storage; quality; postharvest

Categories

Funding

  1. Cairo University, Faculty of Agriculture, Giza, Egypt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Calcium chloride, chitosan, hydrogen peroxide, and ozonated water were studied for their effects on the storage ability and quality of tomato fruit, with chitosan and calcium chloride identified as the most effective treatments. The study also found that ascorbic acid and total carotenoids play a vital role in maintaining tomato fruit quality during storage.
Tomatoes are perishable fruit that makes them deteriorate rapidly during the post-harvest chain. Therefore, the effect of calcium chloride (CaCl2), chitosan, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and ozonated water on the storage abil\ity and quality of tomato fruit (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. 448) stored at 10 degrees C for 28 d was studied. Weight loss, firmness, fruit color, total soluble solids (TSS), titratable acidity, total carotenoids, and ascorbic acid content (AsA) of treated tomato fruit were recorded. Our results revealed that all tested treatments significantly extended the shelf-life and maintained quality of tomato fruit compared to the control. Chitosan and CaCl2 were the most effective treatments in maintaining quality attributes. Furthermore, a correlation study suggested that AsA and total carotenoids played a vital role in conserving tomato fruit quality during storage. PC1 had strong positive loading for pH, appearance, firmness, AsA, TSS, carotene, fruit color (L* & b*) and a strong negative loading for lycopene content, color (a), weight loss, and color index. PC2 had high positive loading for total acidity and total sugar content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available