3.9 Article

Performance of UAV-to-Ground FSO Communications with APD and Pointing Errors

Journal

APPLIED SYSTEM INNOVATION
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/asi4030065

Keywords

unmanned aerial vehicles; free-space optics (FSO); atmospheric turbulence; pointing errors

Funding

  1. Hanoi University of Science and Technology (HUST) [T2020-SAHEP-015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores the combination of UAVs and free-space optics for high data-rate communication links, proposing the use of subcarrier intensity modulation and avalanche photo-diode to improve performance while considering factors like atmospheric turbulence and pointing errors.
Recently, a combination of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) and free-space optics (FSO) has been investigated as a potential method for high data-rate front-haul communication links. The aim of this work was to address the performance of UAV-to-ground station-based FSO communications in terms of the symbol error rate (SER). The system proposes utilizing subcarrier intensity modulation and an avalanche photo-diode (APD) to combat the joint effects of atmospheric turbulence conditions and pointing error due to the UAV's fluctuations. In the proposed system model, the FSO transmitter (Tx) is mounted on the UAV flying over the monitoring area, whereas the FSO receiver (Rx) is placed on either the ground or top of a high building. Unlike previous works related to this topic, we considered combined channel parameters that affect the system performance such as transmitted power, link loss, various atmospheric turbulence conditions, pointing error loss, and the total noise at the APD receiver. Numerical results have shown that, for the best system SER performance, the value of an average APD gain at the Rx can be selected, varying from 18 to 30, whereas the equivalent beam waist radius at the Tx should be in a range from 2 to 2.2 cm in order to decrease the effects from the UAV's fluctuations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available