4.7 Article

Effect of emitter type and mounting configuration on spray coverage for solid set canopy delivery system

Journal

COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE
Volume 112, Issue -, Pages 184-192

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.07.012

Keywords

Solid set delivery; Spray emitter; Orchard; Chemical delivery; Precision application

Funding

  1. Michigan State University [MICL05050]
  2. Washington State University Agricultural Research Center federal formula funds from the U.S. Department of Agriculture National Institutes for Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [WNP0748, WNP0728]
  3. Washington State University Center for Precision & Automated Agricultural Systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Timely and precise application of chemicals is critically important for improved pest control and reduced off-target movement of chemicals. A fixed or solid set canopy delivery (SSCD) system with emitters within a tree canopy has potential to reduce chemical loss and cost by applying right amount of spray at right time and location under favorable ambient conditions. The study was conducted to quantify spray coverage using various emitters mounted at different configurations within tree canopy using a SSCD system. Six different emitter (E) types with varying characteristics were selected for a field study. Each emitter was installed in four different mounting configurations. Water sensitive cards (WSCs) were mounted on upper- and under-side of leaves at 22-25 locations on each tree. After spray application, the WSCs were scanned and analyzed for percent coverage. The configuration with 80 degrees hollow cone emitters (E6) attached to a Y-connector and mounted at height of 2.0 m from the ground exhibited greater mean coverage on the WSCs placed on upper-side (58%) and under-side (21%) of leaves as compared to other emitter and configurations. It was found that coverage with this arrangement was nearly equal in upper (57.5%) and under-side (51.3%) of leaves in the high canopy region, which was the area where emitters were spraying directly. Therefore, configuration using E6 on Y-connector provided the desired uniform canopy coverage, however emitters at more locations would have to be installed to achieve similar coverage in the medium and low canopy regions. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available