4.5 Review

Lung function and breathing patterns in hospitalised COVID-19 survivors: a review of post-COVID-19 Clinics

Journal

RESPIRATORY RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12931-021-01834-5

Keywords

Interstitial Lung Disease; Respiratory Physiology; Ventilation; Infectious Disease; Critical Care and Emergency Medicine

Funding

  1. United Kingdom Research and Innovation (UKRI)
  2. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There is limited research on the effects of COVID-19 on respiratory physiology, particularly breathing patterns. This study found evidence of pulmonary restriction in 65.4% of all patients, with abnormal breathing patterns observed in 18.8% of subjects, suggesting an extrapulmonary cause. The effects on lung function appear to be similar in COVID-19 survivors whether or not they received mechanical ventilation.
Introduction There is relatively little published on the effects of COVID-19 on respiratory physiology, particularly breathing patterns. We sought to determine if there were lasting detrimental effect following hospital discharge and if these related to the severity of COVID-19. Methods We reviewed lung function and breathing patterns in COVID-19 survivors > 3 months after discharge, comparing patients who had been admitted to the intensive therapy unit (ITU) (n = 47) to those who just received ward treatments (n = 45). Lung function included spirometry and gas transfer and breathing patterns were measured with structured light plethysmography. Continuous data were compared with an independent t-test or Mann Whitney-U test (depending on distribution) and nominal data were compared using a Fisher's exact test (for 2 categories in 2 groups) or a chi-squared test (for > 2 categories in 2 groups). A p-value of < 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant. Results We found evidence of pulmonary restriction (reduced vital capacity and/or alveolar volume) in 65.4% of all patients. 36.1% of all patients has a reduced transfer factor (TLCO) but the majority of these (78.1%) had a preserved/increased transfer coefficient (K-CO), suggesting an extrapulmonary cause. There were no major differences between ITU and ward lung function, although K-CO alone was higher in the ITU patients (p = 0.03). This could be explained partly by obesity, respiratory muscle fatigue, localised microvascular changes, or haemosiderosis from lung damage. Abnormal breathing patterns were observed in 18.8% of subjects, although no consistent pattern of breathing pattern abnormalities was evident. Conclusions An extrapulmonary restrictive like pattern appears to be a common phenomenon in previously admitted COVID-19 survivors. Whilst the cause of this is not clear, the effects seem to be similar on patients whether or not they received mechanical ventilation or had ward based respiratory support/supplemental oxygen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available