4.8 Article

Cognitive maps of social features enable flexible inference in social networks

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2021699118

Keywords

social networks; cognitive maps; learning; representation; generalization

Funding

  1. NSF Graduate Research Fellowship [2040433]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the NIH [R21NS108380]
  3. Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science
  4. Division Of Graduate Education
  5. Directorate for STEM Education [2040433] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Individuals can infer unobserved friendships in a social network based on social features. Inference ability depends on a simple similarity heuristic and a complex cognitive map.
In order to navigate a complex web of relationships, an individual must learn and represent the connections between people in a social network. However, the sheer size and complexity of the social world makes it impossible to acquire firsthand knowledge of all relations within a network, suggesting that people must make inferences about unobserved relationships to fill in the gaps. Across three studies (n = 328), we show that people can encode information about social features (e.g., hobbies, clubs) and subsequently deploy this knowledge to infer the existence of unobserved friendships in the network. Using computational models, we test various feature-based mechanisms that could support such inferences. We find that people's ability to successfully generalize depends on two representational strategies: a simple but inflexible similarity heuristic that leverages homophily, and a complex but flexible cognitive map that encodes the statistical relationships between social features and friendships. Together, our studies reveal that people can build cognitive maps encoding arbitrary patterns of latent relations in many abstract feature spaces, allowing social networks to be represented in a flexible format. Moreover, these findings shed light on open questions across disciplines about how people learn and represent social networks and may have implications for generating more human-like link prediction in machine learning algorithms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available