4.5 Review

Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients with severe pancreatitis: a meta-analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 72, Issue 1, Pages 66-68

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2017.139

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whether enteral nutrition (EN) is superior to parenteral nutrition (PN) in critically ill patients with severe acute pancreatitis remains unknown. The objective of this meta-analysis was to assess the effects of EN versus PN on clinical outcomes in a subgroup of pancreatitis patients. Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science from inception to August 2016. Ultimately, five RCTs including 348 patients were enrolled in this analysis. Compared with PN, EN was associated with a significant reduction in overall mortality (risk ratio (RR) = 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.65, P = 0.001) and the rate of multiple organ failure (RR = 0.39, 95% CI 0.21-0.73, P = 0.003). EN should be recommended as the preferred route of nutrition for critically ill patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available