4.3 Article

Teaching chemical engineering using Jupyter notebook: Problem generators and lecturing tools

Journal

EDUCATION FOR CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
Volume 37, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ece.2021.06.004

Keywords

e-learning; Self-learning; Software tools; Jupyter notebook; Python

Funding

  1. Universidad Complutense de Madrid [11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aims to develop teaching materials for chemical engineering students to encourage self-learning, support teaching courses, and develop problem generators and lecturing tools to facilitate student learning.
The primary objective of this study is to develop teaching materials for chemical engineering students (or students pursuing other related B.Sc./M.Sc. degrees) that encourage self-learning to facilitate understanding and the development of problem-solving skills. Tools are oriented to support the teaching of Introduction to Chemical Engineering courses to 1st year B.Sc. students in Chemical Engineering, 2nd year B.Sc. students in Chemistry, and 3rd year B.Sc. students in Biochemistry at the Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM). Problem generators of standard exercises, as an additional complement to the exercises that are used in the lectures, seminars, and assignments to facilitate the learning of the students, have been developed. These generators provide exercises to students with unlimited initial values (with certain restrictions). The software that was used to develop these materials was Jupyter Notebook, which runs under the Python 3.6 language. The problem generators can be classified into fixed problem generators, case-based generators, and random problem generators. Additionally, lecturing tools have been developed to support teaching using live/interactive examples. These examples can learning understanding of various topics of the courses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available