4.6 Article

Identification of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii strains for gut microbiome-based intervention in Alzheimer's-type dementia

Journal

CELL REPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 2, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100398

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan [JP26310111]
  2. Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Japan
  3. Tokyo Tech Fund, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence linking the gut-brain axis to Alzheimer's disease continues to grow, with Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (F. prausnitzii) identified as a potentially important microbe for cognitive function. Specific strains of F. prausnitzii from healthy subjects show promise in improving cognitive impairment in an AD mouse model, suggesting a potential gut microbiome-based intervention for Alzheimer's-type dementia.
Evidence linking the gut-brain axis to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is accumulating, but the characteristics of causally important microbes are poorly understood. We perform a fecal microbiome analysis in healthy subjects and those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD. We find that Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (F. prausnitzii) correlates with cognitive scores and decreases in the MCI group compared with the healthy group. Two isolated strains from the healthy group, live Fp360 and pasteurized Fp14, improve cognitive impairment in an AD mouse model. Whole-genome comparison of isolated strains reveals specific orthologs that are found only in the effective strains and are more abundant in the healthy group compared with the MCI group. Metabolome and RNA sequencing analyses of mouse brains provides mechanistic insights into the relationship between the efficacy of pasteurized Fp14, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial function. We conclude that F. prausnitzii strains with these specific orthologs are candidates for gut microbiome-based intervention in Alzheimer's-type dementia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available