4.8 Review

Mechanics-coupled stability of metal-halide perovskites

Journal

MATTER
Volume 4, Issue 9, Pages 2765-2809

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2021.06.028

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Texas AAMP
  2. M Engineering and Experimental Station (TEES)
  3. Texas AAMP
  4. M Triads for Transformation (T3) seed grant
  5. ONR [N00014-20-2725]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-halide perovskites (MHPs) have great potential in optoelectronic and semiconductor devices, but they are prone to lattice distortion, severe degradation, and failure under mechanical stress. Understanding the mechanics-coupled stability issues is crucial for the durability and commercial viability of MHP-based devices. By reviewing the impact of mechanical stress on MHP devices, insights into mitigating these stability issues can be gained.
Metal- halide perovskites (MHPs) possess enormous potential in optoelectronic and semiconductor devices. In these applications, MHPs are often subjected to mechanical stress, resulting in distorted lattice, severe degradation, and catastrophic failure in MHPs and their interfaces. Understanding these mechanics-coupled stability issues is crucial to the durability and, thus, commercial viability of MHP-based devices. Here, we review the impact of mechanical stress on the integrity and robustness of MHP devices to provide insights into mitigating the mechanics-coupled stability issues. We start with an overview of the structure-elastic-property relationship of MHPs, after which we discuss the current understanding of the cohesive and adhesive failures within MHPs and at MHP interfaces forced by mechanical stress, respectively. We further review the chemical stability issues of MHPs and interfaces induced by themechanical strain. Finally, we summarize the existing strategies to mitigate the mechanics-coupled stability issues and conclude with an outlook of future research directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available