4.6 Article

Characterisation of social support following incarceration among black sexual minority men and transgender women in the HPTN 061 cohort study

Journal

BMJ OPEN
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053334

Keywords

epidemiology; public health; social medicine

Funding

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse grant [R01DA044037]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [HPTN 061, UM1 AI068619, UM1 AI068617, UM1 AI068613]
  3. Fenway Institute Clinical Research Site
  4. Harvard University CFAR [P30 AI060354]
  5. CTU for HIV Prevention and Microbicide Research [UM1 AI069480]
  6. George Washington University CRS: District of Columbia Developmental CFAR [P30 AI087714]
  7. Harlem Prevention Center CRS and NY Blood Center/Union Square CRS: Columbia University CTU [5U01 AI069466]
  8. ARRA [3U01 AI069466--03S1]
  9. Hope Clinic of the Emory Vaccine Center CRS and The Ponce de Leon Center CRS: Emory University HIV/AIDS CTU [5U01 AI069418, CFAR (P30 AI050409), CTSA (UL1 RR025008)]
  10. San Francisco Vaccine and Prevention CRS: ARRA [3U01 AI069496--03S1, 3U01 AI069496--03S2]
  11. UCLA Vine Street CRS: UCLA Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases CTU [U01 AI069424]
  12. New York University Center for Drug Use and HIV Research [P30 DA011041]
  13. New York UniversityCity University of New York (NYU--CUNY) Prevention Research Center [U48 DP005008]
  14. University of Maryland Prevention Research Center by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) [U48 DP006382]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that recent incarceration among black sexual minority men and transgender women is associated with lower levels of social support, particularly in emotional/informational and affectionate aspects.
Objective To examine longitudinal associations between recent incarceration and subsequent social support among black sexual minority men and transgender women, and whether associations differed between those who did and did not have support prior to incarceration. Design A secondary analysis in 2020 of data from the HIV Prevention Trials Network 061, a cohort study of black sexual minority men and transgender women recruited in 2009-2010 and followed for 12 months. Setting Six US cities (Atlanta, Boston, Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco and Washington DC). Participants Individuals >= 18 years of age who identified as black, reported being male or assigned male at birth, reported >= 1 unprotected anal intercourse event with a male partner in the past 6 months, and reported on incarceration at the 6-month follow-up visit. Exposure Having spent >= 1 night in jail/prison in the past 6 months reported at the 6-month follow-up visit. Outcome Social support measured using a six-item scale assessing frequency of emotional/informational, affectionate and tangible support (range 6-30); and dichotomous indicators of low support for each item (ie, receiving that form of support none/little of the time). Results Among participants who returned for the 6-month visit (N=1169), 14% had experienced incarceration in the past 6 months. Mean support score was 20.9; 18.9 among those with recent incarceration versus 21.2 among those without. Recent incarceration predicted lower support (adjusted beta -2.40, 95% CI -3.94 to -0.85). Those recently incarcerated had increased risk of lacking emotional/informational (eg, no one to talk to adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 1.55, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.13) and affectionate (aRR 1.51, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.04) but not tangible support. Effects appeared somewhat stronger among those who had support at baseline. Conclusions Incarceration may reduce support on re-entry among black sexual minority men and transgender women, populations unequally targeted for incarceration and at risk for low support.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available