3.9 Article

Long-term ecotoxicological effects of ciprofloxacin in combination with caffeine on the microalga Raphidocelis subcapitata

Journal

TOXICOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages 429-435

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.02.020

Keywords

Ciprofloxacin; Chlorophyceae; Ecotoxicological assays; Effect concentration; Endpoints; Exposure time

Categories

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq) [131091/2018-2, 300899/2016-5]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2018/03571-2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is an antimicrobial compound that can have long-term effects on aquatic ecosystems and microalgae. When combined with caffeine (CAF), the toxic effects on the microalga Raphidocelis subcapitata were alleviated, but the toxicity changed over the exposure period, highlighting the need for longer-term ecotoxicity assessments.
Ciprofloxacin (CIP) is an antimicrobial pseudo-persistent in aquatic ecosystems. Once dispersed in the water compartments, it can also affect the microalgae. Thus, the evaluation of its long-term ecotoxicological effects is necessary. CIP interactions with other pharmaceuticals are not well known. In this study, we investigated the toxic effects of CIP alone and combined with caffeine (CAF), using the modified Gompertz model parameters and the chlorophyll-a production of the microalga Raphidocelis subcapitata as endpoints, throughout a 16-day exposure assay. The exposure to CIP alone led to significant reductions of the growth rate and the cell density of the microalgae compared to control groups. The combination with CAF lowered the adverse effects of CIP to R. subcapitata. However, as the toxicity is dynamic, our results indicated that the toxic effects in respect to the studied endpoints changed throughout the exposure period, reinforcing the need for longer-term ecotoxicity assessments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available