4.4 Review

Application of Gene Editing for Climate Change in Agriculture

Journal

FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.685801

Keywords

gene edited crops; livestock genetics; climate change; agriculture; food system; food security; livestock genetic resources; crop biotechnology

Funding

  1. UC Berkeley
  2. NIH [DP5-OD023072]
  3. Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research (FFAR) Fellows program
  4. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowships Program
  5. Genetics and Genomics Scholars Program, North Carolina State University
  6. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  7. USDA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change poses a serious threat to agricultural systems, food security, and human nutrition, while gene editing in crops and livestock is being used to enhance performance to adapt to climate change. Although only a few gene editing applications have been applied to agricultural production, many studies indicate the potential for effective use of gene editing to address climate change in the near future.
Climate change imposes a severe threat to agricultural systems, food security, and human nutrition. Meanwhile, efforts in crop and livestock gene editing have been undertaken to improve performance across a range of traits. Many of the targeted phenotypes include attributes that could be beneficial for climate change adaptation. Here, we present examples of emerging gene editing applications and research initiatives that are aimed at the improvement of crops and livestock in response to climate change, and discuss technical limitations and opportunities therein. While only few applications of gene editing have been translated to agricultural production thus far, numerous studies in research settings have demonstrated the potential for potent applications to address climate change in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available