4.2 Article

Environmental Impact Assessment: A Middle Eastern Experience

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW
Volume 33, Issue 2, Pages 309-338

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jel/eqab002

Keywords

environmental impact assessment; Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; environmental governance; environmental law; EIA procedure/steps; screening; scoping; environmental statement; general environmental law; rules for implementation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article examines the legal status and procedure of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia within a Middle Eastern context. It uses two types of analysis: doctrinal analysis focusing on legal provisions, and qualitative analysis based on original interview data. The key contribution is the synthesis of current theories in the international literature on the underexplored issue of EIAs in the KSA.
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) is an important environmental protection tool introduced into the environmental governance framework to evaluate and inform the administrative decision-making processes regarding whether certain developments or projects are to be allowed. In this article, EIA's legal status and procedure are examined in relation to a Middle Eastern context, specifically to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Two different types of analysis are employed. The first is doctrinal analysis, focusing on the legal and statutory provisions regulating and organising this environmental protection tool-this genre of analysis entails identifying and unpacking the laws and regulations that govern this tool. The second type is qualitative analysis involving original data from 27 semi-structured interviews-one of the first of its kind on this topic in the KSA. The key contribution of the article comprises the examination and synthesis of the current status of different theories in the current international literature with regard to the underexplored issue of EIAs in the KSA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available