4.5 Review

External factors influencing mesenchymal stem cell fate in vitro

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages 13-33

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2016.11.003

Keywords

MSCs; Self-renewal; Differentiation; Cell source; Donor age; Culture conditions; Cell culture media; Supplementary factors; Hypoxia; Mechano-/electro-stimuli; 3D scaffolds

Categories

Funding

  1. Iranian Council for Stem Cell Research and Technology [REP208]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have extensive potentials, which make them attractive candidates for the developmental biology, drug discovery and regenerative medicine. However, the use of MSCs is limited by their scarceness in tissues and in culture conditions. They also exhibit various degrees of potency which subsequently influencing their applications. Nowadays, questions remain about how self-renewal and differentiation of MSCs can be controlled in vitro and in vivo, how they will behave and migrate to the right place and how they modulate the immune system. Therefore, identification of factors and culture conditions to affect the fate and function of MSCs may be effective to enhance their applications in clinical situations. Studies have indicated that the fate of MSCs in culture is influenced by various external factors, including the specific cell source, donor age, plating density, passage number and plastic surface quality. Some other factors such as cell culture media and their supplementary factors, 02 concentration, mechano-ielectro-stimuli and three-dimensional scaffolds are also shown to be influential. This review addresses the current state of MSC research for describing and discussing the findings about external factors that influence the fate and function of MSCs. Additionally, the new discoveries and suggestions regarding their molecular mechanisms will be explained. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available