3.9 Article

Advancements in Field Testing for Locating Geomembrane Installation Damage

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s40891-021-00309-3

Keywords

Electrical leak location; Geomembrane installation damage; Dipole method; Covered geomembrane testing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses recent advancements in covered geomembrane electrical leak location testing, including an improved dipole method testing ASTM standard practice. By controlling site conditions, standardizing measurement density, optimizing sensitivity, and enhancing reporting requirements, the testing effectiveness has been improved. These advancements ensure the certainty of locating all installation damage before the operational life of a containment facility.
The most significant damage to installed geomembranes is caused during cover material placement and can typically only be found if covered geomembrane testing is performed using electrical leak location methods. Recent advancements in covered geomembrane electrical leak location testing include an improved dipole method testing ASTM standard practice. In this paper, the technical issues with previously used dipole method standard procedures are explained along with a detailed description of how the improved practice addresses those technical flaws. In addition, testing effectiveness is improved by the new standard practice through controlling site conditions, standardizing measurement density as a function of the dipole spacing, providing procedures for optimizing sensitivity, and enhancing reporting requirements to enable reviewability. Reporting examples of the testing methods are provided, advancements in dipole method equipment for faster and more precise testing are discussed, and recommendations are made for further optimizing testing effectiveness. As a result of the testing methodology advancements, covered geomembrane testing can be performed with the certainty of locating all installation damage before the operational life of a containment facility.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available