4.7 Article

Concurrent removal of hardness and fluoride in water by monopolar electrocoagulation

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106105

Keywords

Defluoridation; Electrocoagulation; Fluoride; Hardness; Response surface method

Funding

  1. National Research Council Sri Lanka [NRC-TO-16-015, DL20180052]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Water treatment based on electrocoagulation is attractive due to in-situ production of chemicals and colloids, but optimization of operation parameters is necessary. Response surface method was used to optimize EC cell parameters, achieving optimal removal efficiencies for hardness and fluoride. Different chemical species in the solution matrix significantly affect the hardness and fluoride removal efficiencies.
Water treatment based on electrocoagulation (EC) is attractive since required chemicals and colloids are produced in-situ. However, optimisation of EC operation parameters is necessary to enhance its efficiency. We optimised EC cell parameters by the response surface method (RSM). The optimal removal efficiencies of hardness (63%) and fluoride (97%) were achieved at 1.98 kW h/m(3). With the removal of divalent cations, some anionic species concurrently remove via an energetically feasible route to adjust the charge balance. When simulated water is used (450 mg/L TDS, 580 mg/L CaCO3, 10 mg/L fluorides and pH 6.50), 83% hardness and 99% fluoride are removed with 0.69 kW h/m(2) energy consumption. The chemical species in the solution matrix, particularly SO42, significantly affect the hardness and fluoride removal efficiencies. The contaminated EC sludge resulted from feed water is characterised by spectroscopic methods to probe hardness and fluoride removal mechanisms. In the presence of Mg2+, F- interacts with Al-sludge sites forming MgF - OH. When Ca2+ and F- are present, both CaF -OH and CaF are formed. In Ca2+, Mg2+ and F- treated Al-sludge dominates = CaF-OH and CaF over MgF OH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available