4.1 Article

Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome with 22q11.21 microduplication: a case report

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL CASE REPORTS
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13256-021-02716-6

Keywords

Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome; Mullerian anomalies; Multiple congenital anomalies; 22q11; 2 microduplication

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MRKH syndrome is a congenital condition characterized by agenesis of vagina and uterus, sometimes associated with other organ defects. Patients with a microduplication on chromosome 22q11.21 may exhibit a wide range of clinical features, possibly linking them to DiGeorge/velocardiofacial syndrome.
Background Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man [OMIM] #277000) is a congenital condition characterized by the total or partial agenesis of vagina and uterus. Agenesis can be isolated (MRKH 1) or associated with other renal, vertebral or cardiac defects (MRKH 2). Case presentation In this paper, we report a case of a Caucasian patient showing the clinical signs associated with MRKH. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (a-CGH) analysis revealed a microduplication of approximately 3.01 megabases (Mb) located on the long arm of chromosome 22 (22q11.21). Microduplications affecting the 22q11.21 region have been shown to be associated with MRKH syndrome and Mullerian aplasia. The phenotype of patients with 22q11.2 duplication (OMIM #608363) appears extremely variable, ranging from apparently normal to mild learning difficulties or with multiple defects, sharing features with DiGeorge/velocardiofacial (DGS/VCFS) syndrome. Conclusions The altered gene expression together with other genetic, nongenetic, epigenetic or environmental factors can cause the extremely variable phenotype in patients carrying such duplication. Therefore, we can consider MRKH syndrome to be one of the clinical features of DGS/VCFS syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available