4.3 Article

Prospective Evaluation of Galactomannan and (1→3) β-D-Glucan Assays as Diagnostic Tools for Invasive Fungal Disease in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Receiving Fungal Prophylaxis

Journal

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piab036

Keywords

acute myeloid leukemia; fungal biomarkers; fungal disease; pediatrics; surveillance

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute's Biomarker, Imaging and Quality of Life Studies Funding Program [HHSN261200800001E]
  2. National Cancer Institute's support of the Children's Oncology Group [U10CA 180886, U10CA 180899, UG1CA 189955]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that surveillance testing with Platelia GM EIA and Fungitell BDG assay was not successful in detecting invasive fungal disease in children with AML receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Using these assays for surveillance in this clinical setting should be discouraged.
Background. Patients receiving chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are at high risk for invasive fungal disease (IFD). Diagnosis of IFD is challenging, leading to interest in fungal biomarkers. The objective was to define the utility of surveillance testing with Platelia Aspergillus galactomannan (GM) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Fungitell beta-D-glucan (BDG) assay in children with AML receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Methods. Twice-weekly surveillance blood testing with GM EIA and BDG assay was performed during periods of neutropenia in the context of a randomized trial of children, adolescents, and young adults with AML allocated to fluconazole or caspofungin prophylaxis. Proven or probable IFD was adjudicated using blinded central reviewers. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for Platelia and Fungitell assays alone and in combination for the outcomes of proven and probable invasive aspergillosis (IA) or invasive candidiasis (IC). Results. Among 471 patients enrolled, 425 participants (209 fluconazole and 216 caspofungin) contributed >= 1 blood specimen. In total, 6103 specimens were evaluated, with a median of 15 specimens per patient (range 1-43). The NPV was >99% for GM EIA and BDG assay alone and in combination. However, there were no true positive results, resulting in sensitivity and PPV for each assay of 0%. Conclusions. The GM EIA and the BDG assay alone or in combination were not successful at detecting IA or IC during periods of neutropenia in children, adolescents, and young adults with AML receiving antifungal prophylaxis. Utilization of these assays for surveillance in this clinical setting should be discouraged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available