4.7 Article

Adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research recommendations and colorectal cancer risk

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages 86-94

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.08.015

Keywords

Case-econtrol; Colorectal neoplasms; Diet; Nutrition policy; Prevention

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Foundation for Cancer Research (FIRC)
  2. Italian Association for Research on Cancer (AIRC IG) [1468]
  3. EU [036224]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF) and the American Institute for Cancer Research (AICR) released in 2007 eight recommendations for cancer prevention on body fatness, diet and physical activity. Our aim is to evaluate the relation between adherence to these recommendations and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Methods: We pooled data from two Italian case-econtrol studies including overall 2419 patients with CRC and 4723 controls. Adherence to the WCRF/AICR guidelines was summarised through a score incorporating seven of the WCRF/AICR recommendations, with higher scores indicating higher adherence to the guidelines. Odds ratios (ORs) of colorectal cancer were estimated using multiple logistic regression models. Results: Higher adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations was associated with a significantly reduced CRC risk (OR 0.67, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.56-0.80 for a score >= 5 versus <3.5), with a significant trend of decreasing risk for increasing adherence (p < 0.001). Consistent results were found for colon (OR 0.67) and rectal cancer (OR 0.67). Inverse associations were observed with the diet-specific WCRF/AICR score (OR 0.71, 95% CI, 0.61-0.84 for >= 3.5 versus <2.5 points) and with specific recommendations on body fatness (OR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.70-0.97), physical activity (OR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.75-1.00), foods and drinks that promote weight gain (OR 0.70, 95% CI, 0.56-0.89), foods of plant origin (OR 0.56, 95% CI, 0.42-0.76), limiting alcohol (OR 0.87, 95% CI, 0.77-0.99) and salt intake (OR 0.63, 95% CI, 0.48-0.84). Conclusion: Our study indicated that adherence to the WCRF/AICR recommendations is inversely related to CRC risk. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available