4.5 Review

The rejection of perfluoroalkyl substances by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis: influencing factors and combination processes

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-WATER RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages 1928-1943

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ew00490e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51808442, 51808432, 52070152]
  2. Natural Science Basic Research Plan of Shaanxi Province [2019JQ-529, 2018JQ5014]
  3. Science and Technology Planning Project of Yulin City [2019-136, 2019-179, CXY-2020-060, CXY-2020-101]
  4. PhD Start-up Foundation of Xi'an University of Science and Technology [2018QDJ023]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M683679XB]
  6. Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province [2021NY-168]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Traditional methods and advanced treatment processes are not suitable for PFAS removal due to their poor efficiency. Membrane processes such as NF and RO can effectively remove multiple substances, are energy-saving, and show more promise for PFAS removal.
The detection of perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) in surface waters is concerning because these compounds are bioaccumulative and potentially biotoxic. Therefore, the development of simple, efficient, and energy-saving methods to remove these persistent organic pollutants from water is extremely urgent. Due to the stability and typically low concentrations of PFASs conventional removal processes and some advanced treatment processes (such as coagulation and electrocatalysis) are not suitable for PFAS removal due to their relatively poor removal efficiency or harsh reaction conditions. Membrane processes, such as nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO), can effectively remove multiple substances, are energy-saving, and do not require a phase change. Therefore, these PFAS removal methods show more promise for practical application. This article reviews the current research progress regarding the influence of typical NF and RO factors on PFAS removal. In addition, the research status and prospects of other water treatment processes combined with membrane processes are summarized and assessed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available