4.1 Article

Recovering and restitution of unknown, unidentified, and unlabeled samples in laboratories using EDXRF analysis

Journal

METHODSX
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101435

Keywords

EDXRF; Spectra; Unknown samples; XRF; Elemental characterization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a method to recover and label unknown samples in a nuclear laboratory using Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) spectrometry, which is found to be a new powerful tool that can be used in different laboratories.
This Study presents a method to recover and label unknown samples in a nuclear laboratory using Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF) spectrometry based on spectra differentiation and analysis. This method was found to be a new powerful tool that can be used in different laboratories where a certain number of samples cannot be identified because they have never been identified, their labeling and identification cannot be assessed because of degradation, and/or any other causes. The method was found to be simple, timely appropriate, not expensive, and powerful in identifying and recover the information needed for a sample. The EDXRF spectrometry method for recovering unknown samples in laboratories was based on the following three main points: EDXRF method allows the elemental characterization of any sample without clear identification in a laboratory; The displaying of several samples' spectra on the same graph allows direct comparison and identification when the sample's data overlap one of the stored data; and The identification of the unknown sample based on the EDXRF results: The faster method being the overlapping comparison while the elemental characterization-based identification needs high skilled expertise in X-ray fluorescence analysis. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available