3.8 Article

Ultrasound-Assisted Emulsified Microextraction Based on Deep Eutectic Solvent for Trace Residue Analysis of Metribuzin in Urine Samples

Journal

METHODS AND OBJECTS OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 153-161

Publisher

TARAS SHEVCHENKO NATL UNIV KYIV
DOI: 10.17721/moca.2021.153-161

Keywords

deep eutectic solvents; sample preparation; ultrasound assisted emulsified microextraction; metribuzin; urine; high performance liquid chromatography

Funding

  1. Tehran University of Medical Sciences grant [43194]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new sample preparation method using deep eutectic solvent for determining metribuzin in urine samples was developed and optimized. The method showed linear calibration curve, high accuracy, and reproducibility under the optimum conditions. With a limit of quantification of 5 μg L-1, the method demonstrated good sensitivity for detecting metribuzin.
Deep eutectic solvent was used as extraction solvent to develop and optimize a new sample preparation method for the determination of metribuzin in urine samples. In order to determine the optimal values of the effective factors in the deep eutectic solvent-based ultrasound assisted emulsification microextraction method, six effective parameters were selected. The design of experiments was performed using the one-variable-at-a-time method. Totally, 96 experimental runs were performed, and the samples were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography with a UV detector. Under the optimum conditions, the calibration curve for metribuzin was linear in the concentration range of 5 to 500 mu g L-1 for urine samples. The accuracy and reproducibility of the introduced method were determined using the relative recovery (RR %) and relative standard deviation (RSD %) tests on the fortified urine samples. RR % and RSD % were found to be 96.3 - 101.7 % and 3.2 - 7.6 %, respectively. The limit of quantification and the limit of detection were obtained 5 and 0.8 mu g L-1, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available