4.7 Article

Constraining f(R) gravity with a k-cut cosmic shear analysis of the Hyper Suprime-Cam first-year data

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 104, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.083527

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Caltech Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship (SURF)
  2. NASA Postdoctoral Program Fellowship
  3. NSF [AST-1813694]
  4. US Department of Energy [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  5. Alice and Edward Stone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam data, the study performed cosmic shear analysis constraining both Lambda CDM and f(R) Hu-Sawicki modified gravity parameters. The k-cut method effectively reduced sensitivity to small scale modes and ensured robustness to baryonic feedback model uncertainty. This approach could be valuable for constraining a wide range of gravity theories in the future.
Using Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) year 1 data, we perform the first k-cut cosmic shear analysis constraining both Lambda CDM and f(R) Hu-Sawicki modified gravity. To generate the f(R) cosmic shear theory vector, we use the matter power spectrum emulator trained on COLA (COmoving Lagrangian Acceleration) simulations [Phys. Rev. D 103, 123525 (2021). The k-cut method is used to significantly down-weight sensitivity to small scale (k > 1 h Mpc(-1)) modes in the matter power spectrum where the emulator is less accurate, while simultaneously ensuring our results are robust to baryonic feedback model uncertainty. We have also developed a test to ensure that the effects of poorly modeled small scales are nulled as intended. For Lambda CDM we find S-8 = sigma(8)(Omega(m)/0.3)(0.5) = 0.789(-0.022)(+0.039), while the constraints on the f(R) modified gravity parameters are prior dominated. In the future, the k-cut method could be used to constrain a large number of theories of gravity where computational limitations make it infeasible to model the matter power spectrum down to extremely small scales.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available