4.7 Article

Improving public health by improving clinical trial guidelines and their application

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 38, Issue 21, Pages 1632-1637B

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx086

Keywords

Clinical trials; Pragmatic clinical trials; Randomized controlled trials; Cardiovascular diseases

Funding

  1. University of Oxford
  2. IDDI
  3. CluePoints
  4. CHDR Leiden
  5. Heart Center Leipzig
  6. St. Jude Medical
  7. Boston Scientific
  8. Astra Zeneca
  9. The Medicines Company
  10. Abbott Vascular
  11. Janssen
  12. Bayer
  13. Novartis
  14. Cardiorentis
  15. Wellcome Trust [098504/Z/12/Z]
  16. MRC
  17. NIHR
  18. GlaxoSmithKline
  19. European Union
  20. AstraZeneca
  21. National Cancer Research Institute
  22. BioMed Central
  23. Merck
  24. Boehringer Ingelheim
  25. British Heart Foundation (BHF) Chair in Cardiovascular Medicine at the University of Oxford
  26. BHF
  27. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  28. Medical Research Council [MC_U137686860, MC_UU_12026/4] Funding Source: researchfish
  29. National Institute for Health Research [14/49/159] Funding Source: researchfish
  30. MRC [MC_UU_12026/4, MC_U137686860] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evidence generated from randomized controlled trials forms the foundation of cardiovascular therapeutics and has led to the adoption of numerous drugs and devices that prolong survival and reduce morbidity, as well as the avoidance of interventions that have been shown to be ineffective or even unsafe. Many aspects of cardiovascular research have evolved considerably since the first randomized trials in cardiology were conducted. In order to be large enough to provide reliable evidence about effects on major outcomes, cardiovascular trials may now involve thousands of patients recruited from hundreds of clinical sites in many different countries. Costly infrastructure has developed to meet the increasingly complex organizational and operational requirements of these clinical trials. Concerns have been raised that this approach is unsustainable, inhibiting the reliable evaluation of new and existing treatments, to the detriment of patient care. These issues were considered by patients, regulators, funders, and trialists at a meeting of the European Society of Cardiology Cardiovascular Roundtable in October 2015. This paper summarizes the key insights and discussions from the workshop, highlights subsequent progress, and identifies next steps to produce meaningful change in the conduct of cardiovascular clinical research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available