4.2 Article

Training Strategies for Radiology Deep Learning Models in Data-limited Scenarios

Journal

RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Volume 3, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/ryai.2021210014

Keywords

Computer-aided Detection/Diagnosis; Transfer Learning; Limited Annotated Data; Augmentation; Synthetic Data; Semisupervised Learning; Federated Learning; Few-Shot Learning; Class Imbalance

Funding

  1. Department of Radiology of The Ohio State University College of Medicine
  2. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Data-driven approaches have great potential in shaping future practices in radiology, but face challenges such as patient privacy concerns, tedious annotation processes, and limited expert resources. This review discusses model training strategies in scenarios with limited data, insufficiently labeled data, and/or limited expert resources, including enlarging data samples, decreasing manual labeling burdens, adjusting network architectures, and leveraging pretrained models.
Data-driven approaches have great potential to shape future practices in radiology. The most straightforward strategy to obtain clinically accurate models is to use large, well-curated and annotated datasets. However, patient privacy constraints, tedious annotation processes, and the limited availability of radiologists pose challenges to building such datasets. This review details model training strategies in scenarios with limited data, insufficiently labeled data, and/or limited expert resources. This review discusses strategies to enlarge the data sample, decrease the time burden of manual supervised labeling, adjust the neural network architecture to improve model performance, apply semisupervised approaches, and leverage efficiencies from pretrained models. (C) RSNA, 2021.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available