4.6 Article

BFpack: Flexible Bayes Factor Testing of Scientific Theories in R

Journal

JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE
Volume 100, Issue 18, Pages 1-63

Publisher

JOURNAL STATISTICAL SOFTWARE
DOI: 10.18637/jss.v100.i18

Keywords

Bayes factors; hypothesis testing; equality/order constrained hypotheses; R

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research (NWO)
  2. NWO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There have been significant methodological developments in Bayes factors for hypothesis testing in the social and behavioral sciences, but available software tools are still limited. BFpack is a new R package that offers Bayes factor hypothesis testing functions for common testing problems.
There have been considerable methodological developments of Bayes factors for hypothesis testing in the social and behavioral sciences, and related fields. This development is due to the flexibility of the Bayes factor for testing multiple hypotheses simultaneously, the ability to test complex hypotheses involving equality as well as order constraints on the parameters of interest, and the interpretability of the outcome as the weight of evidence provided by the data in support of competing scientific theories. The available software tools for Bayesian hypothesis testing are still limited however. In this paper we present a new R package called BFpack that contains functions for Bayes factor hypothesis testing for the many common testing problems. The software includes novel tools for (i) Bayesian exploratory testing (e.g., zero vs positive vs negative effects), (ii) Bayesian confirmatory testing (competing hypotheses with equality and/or order constraints), (iii) common statistical analyses, such as linear regression, generalized linear models, (multivariate) analysis of (co)variance, correlation analysis, and random intercept models, (iv) using default priors, and (v) while allowing data to contain missing observations that are missing at random.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available