4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Sensitivity estimates for diffuse, point-like, and extended neutrino sources with KM3NeT/ARCA

Journal

JOURNAL OF INSTRUMENTATION
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/16/09/C09030

Keywords

Analysis and statistical methods; Neutrino detectors; Performance of High Energy Physics Detectors; Software architectures (event data models, frameworks and databases)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The KM3NeT detector being built in the Mediterranean Sea will have unprecedented angular resolution for identifying cosmic neutrino sources, complementing IceCube's sky view and sensitivity to a wide range of energies. Statistical methods are being developed to distinguish cosmic neutrinos from atmospheric neutrinos and muons, and sensitivity estimates for various types of neutrino sources are being conducted.
The identification of cosmic objects emitting high energy neutrinos could provide new insights about the Universe and its active sources. The existence of these cosmic neutrinos has been proven by the IceCube Collaboration, but the big question of which sources these neutrinos originate from, remains unanswered. The KM3NeT detector for Astroparticle Research with Cosmics in the Abyss (ARCA), with a cubic kilometer instrumented volume, is currently being built in the Mediterranean Sea. It will excel at identifying cosmic neutrino sources due to its unprecedented angular resolution for muon neutrinos (< 0.2 degree for E > 10 TeV events). KM3NeT has a view of the sky complementary to IceCube, and is sensitive to neutrinos across a wide range of energies. In order to identify the signature of cosmic neutrino sources in the background of atmospheric neutrinos and muons, statistical methods are being developed and tested with Monte-Carlo pseudo-experiments. This contribution presents the most recent sensitivity estimates for diffuse, point-like, and extended neutrino sources with KM3NeT/ARCA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available