4.0 Article

'Rebirthing' the Violent Past: Friction Between Post-Conflict Axioms of Remembrance and Cambodian Buddhist Forgetting

Journal

ANTHROPOLOGICAL FORUM
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 291-311

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00664677.2021.1971512

Keywords

Memorialisation; human rights regime; cultural competency; genocide; Cambodia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ethnographic interviews with Cambodian interlocutors reveal resistance to victim-perpetrator outreach, truth telling, and memorialisation in post-conflict Human Rights regimes, due to the incommensurability between Buddhist and Euro Western perspectives on memory work. The localisation of Euro Western memory work is seen as culturally incongruent and potentially threatening to the healing and reconciliation process that the HR regime aims to achieve. The clash between cultural perspectives and mnemonic axioms highlights the complexity of implementing globalised practices of conflict prevention and memorialisation.
Problematising the vernacularisation of key mechanisms in post-conflict Human Rights (HR) regimes, ethnographic interviews with Cambodian interlocutors present resistance to victim-perpetrator outreach and reconciliation, truth telling, and memorialisation. Resistance stems from the incommensurability between Buddhist present and future-focused perspectives and Euro Western (EW) past-focused memory work so central to the above mechanisms of post-conflict reconciliation. The vernacularisation of EW memory work is not only perceived as culturally incongruent, but appears to threaten a resurgence of genocide-related distress and strife that the HR regime hoped to assuage. Rather than calling for improved cultural competency of vernacularised memory work, accounts disclose the incommensurability of the taken for granted core EW mnemonic axiom (and scenario) that retrieval of the painful past and its public representation may somehow promote healing, rehabilitation and future conflict prevention. As common denominator embedded within multiple mechanisms of the HR model of conflict prevention, this axiom will be epistemically and historically contextualised in HR discourse on memorialisation. Implications will be considered for the future of globalised practices of memorialisation, conflict prevention and the HR regime sustaining axiomatic violence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available