4.7 Article

The interpretation of temperature and salinity variables in numerical ocean model output and the calculation of heat fluxes and heat content

Journal

GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 6445-6466

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-14-6445-2021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [FL150100090]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Earth and Environmental System Sciences Division, Regional and Global Modeling and Analysis Program (LLNL) [DE-AC52-07NA27344, LLNL-JRNL-823462]
  3. Australian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the impact of TEOS-10 and EOS-80 equations on ocean heat content, particularly focusing on the interpretation of salinity and temperature variables in coupled models, as well as how to calculate and compare data from these models with observational data.
The international Thermodynamic Equation of Seawater 2010 (TEOS-10) defined the enthalpy and entropy of seawater, thus enabling the global ocean heat content to be calculated as the volume integral of the product of in situ density, rho, and potential enthalpy, h(0) (with reference sea pressure of 0 dbar). In terms of Conservative Temperature, Theta, ocean heat content is the volume integral of rho c(p)(0)Theta, where c(p)(0) is a constant isobaric heat capacity. However, many ocean models in the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) as well as all models that contributed to earlier phases, such as CMIP5, CMIP3, CMIP2, and CMIP1, used EOS-80 (Equation of State - 1980) rather than the updated TEOS-10, so the question arises of how the salinity and temperature variables in these models should be physically interpreted, with a particular focus on comparison to TEOS-10-compliant observations. In this article we address how heat content, surface heat fluxes, and the meridional heat transport are best calculated using output from these models and how these quantities should be compared with those calculated from corresponding observations. We conclude that even though a model uses the EOS-80, which expects potential temperature as its input temperature, the most appropriate interpretation of the model's temperature variable is actually Conservative Temperature. This perhaps unexpected interpretation is needed to ensure that the air-sea heat flux that leaves and arrives in atmosphere and sea ice models is the same as that which arrives in and leaves the ocean model. We also show that the salinity variable carried by present TEOS-10-based models is Preformed Salinity, while the salinity variable of EOS-80-based models is also proportional to Preformed Salinity. These interpretations of the salinity and temperature variables in ocean models are an update on the comprehensive Griffies et al. (2016) paper that discusses the interpretation of many aspects of coupled Earth system models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available