Journal
ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages 6835-6850Publisher
COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-14-6835-2021
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation [P-2018-11129]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Chemical ionization mass spectrometry using iodide as a reagent ion is widely used for classifying organic compounds in the atmosphere by their elemental formula. Calibration of these instruments is challenging due to the lack of commercially available standards for many compounds, leading to the development of methods for estimating CIMS sensitivity. Coupling a thermal desorption aerosol gas chromatograph simultaneously to a flame ionization detector and an iodide CIMS allows for examining the sensitivity of the CIMS and its variability between isomers of the same elemental formula.
Chemical ionization mass spectrometry (CIMS) using iodide as a reagent ion has been widely used to classify organic compounds in the atmosphere by their elemental formula. Unfortunately, calibration of these instruments is challenging due to a lack of commercially available standards for many compounds, which has led to the development of methods for estimating CIMS sensitivity. By coupling a thermal desorption aerosol gas chromatograph (TAG) simultaneously to a flame ionization detector (FID) and an iodide CIMS, we use the individual particle-phase analytes, quantified by the FID, to examine the sensitivity of the CIMS and its variability between isomers of the same elemental formula. Iodide CIMS sensitivities of isomers within a formula are found to generally vary by 1 order of magnitude with a maximum deviation of 2 orders of magnitude. Furthermore, we compare directly measured sensitivity to a method of estimating sensitivity based on declustering voltage (i.e., voltage scanning). This approach is found to carry high uncertainties for individual analytes (0.5 to 1 order of magnitude) but represents a central tendency that can be used to estimate the sum of analytes with reasonable error (similar to 30% differences between predicted and measured moles). Finally, gas chromatography (GC) retention time, which is associated with vapor pressure and chemical functionality of an analyte, is found to qualitatively correlate with iodide CIMS sensitivity, but the relationship is not close enough to be quantitatively useful and could be explored further in the future as a potential calibration approach.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available