3.8 Article

Image Based Sexual Abuse proclivity and victim blaming: The role of dark personality traits and moral disengagement

Journal

ONATI SOCIO-LEGAL SERIES
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 1179-1197

Publisher

ONATI INT INST SOCIOLOGY LAW
DOI: 10.35295/OSLS.IISL/0000-0000-0000-1213

Keywords

Image Based Sexual Abuse; IBSA; perpetrators; moral disengagement; dark tetrad

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that Machiavellianism and psychopathy predicted the propensity for IBSA, while rivalry narcissism predicted greater excitement and amusement towards IBSA. Moral disengagement predicted the propensity for IBSA and blaming the victim, and was positively related to greater feelings of amusement and excitement towards IBSA. This suggests a distinct personality profile of IBSA perpetrators and the role of moral disengagement mechanisms in facilitating and reinforcing this behavior.
Image Based Sexual Abuse (IBSA) denotes the creation, distribution, and/or threat of distribution of intimate images of another person online without their consent. The present study aims to extend emerging research on perpetration of IBSA with the development and preliminary validation for the moral disengagement in IBSA scale, while also examining the role of the dark triad, sadism, and sexism in a person's likelihood to perpetrate IBSA. One hundred and twenty English speaking participants (76 women, 44 men; mean age=33 years) were recruited via social media. Machiavellianism and psychopathy were found to predict IBSA proclivity, whilst rivalry narcissism predicted greater feelings of excitement and amusement towards IBSA. Moral disengagement predicted IBSA proclivity and blaming the victim. It was also positively related to greater feelings of amusement and excitement towards IBSA. This suggests a distinct personality profile of IBSA perpetrators, and that moral disengagement mechanisms play a role in facilitating and reinforcing this behaviour.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available